« DIRELAND ON N.P.R. THURSDAY | Main | THE HOWARD HUGHES SCORSESE DOESN'T TELL YOU ABOUT »

January 27, 2005

WHY U.S. MEDIA DISMISSED THE LANCET STUDY OF 100,000 IRAQI CIVILIAN DEAD

The Chronicle of Higher Education today has a top-drawer article about the researchers from Johns Hopkins and Columbia Universities  who published the study in the British medical journal The Lancet suggesting there were 100,000 Iraqi civilian dead from the war and the occupation. Lila Guterman, the article's author, notes that, "On the eve of a contentious presidential election -- fought in part over U.S. policy on Iraq -- many American newspapers and television news programs ignored the study or buried reports about it far from the top headlines."

The Chronicle article recounts in detail the methdology used for the study's 8000 interviews, in which 30 homes in each of 33 neighborhoods all over Iraq were visited. And other statisticins confirm the validity of the Lancet study's methdology: "Scientists say the size of the survey was adequate for extrapolation to the entire country. 'That's a classical sample size,' says Michael J. Toole, head of the Center for International Health at the Burnet Institute, an Australian research organization. Researchers typically conduct surveys in 30 neighborhoods, so the Iraq study's total of 33 strengthens its conclusions. 'I just don't see any evidence of significant exaggeration,' he says.

The researchers, including Johns Hopkins' Les Roberts--whose previous mortality statistics of conflicts had been used as fact by both the State Department and the U.N.--were particularly shocked by their findings in Fallujah:

"The Fallujah data were chilling: 53 deaths had taken place in the study's 30 households there since the invasion commenced, on March 19, 2003. In the other 32 neighborhoods combined, the researchers had counted 89 deaths. While 21 of the deaths elsewhere were attributable to violence, in Fallujah 52 of the 53 deaths were due to violence.

"The number of deaths in Fallujah was so much higher than in other locations that the researchers excluded the data from their overall estimate as a statistical outlier. Because of that, Mr. Roberts says, chances are good that the actual number of deaths caused by the invasion and occupation is higher than 100,000.

"Mr. Roberts took a few days in Baghdad in late September to compile and analyze the data. He discovered that the risk of death was 2.5 times as high in the 18 months after the invasion as it was in the 15 months before it; the risk was still 1.5 times as high if he ignored the Fallujah data. Because he had found in many other wars that malnutrition and disease were the most frequent causes of civilian deaths, he was 'shocked,] he says, that violence had been the primary cause of death since the invasion."

Guterman's article dissects the U.S.  mass media's attempts to dismiss the study's findings while European newspapers front-paged the story. The results of Guterman's interviews with the "experts" American newspapers relied upon to discredit the Lancet study should cause red faces at some of our national dailies. For example, "The Washington Post, perhaps most damagingly to the study's reputation, quoted Marc E. Garlasco, a senior military analyst at Human Rights Watch, as saying, 'These numbers seem to be inflated.'

"Mr. Garlasco says now that he had not read the paper at the time and calls his quote in the Post 'really unfortunate.' He says he told the reporter, "I haven't read it. I haven't seen it. I don't know anything about it, so I shouldn't comment on it.' But, Mr. Garlasco continues, 'like any good journalist, he got me to.'

"Mr. Garlasco says he misunderstood the reporter's description of the paper's results. He did not understand that the paper's estimate includes deaths caused not only directly by violence but also by its offshoots: chaos leading to lack of sanitation and medical care."

David R. Meddings, a medical officer with the Department of Injuries and Violence Prevention at the World Health Organization, points out why the study was so important: "If you can put accurate information out [on civilian casualties], it shifts the burden of proof onto militaries to substantiate why what they're doing is worth this humanitarian cost."

The Chronicle article is another case study of the institutional corruption of U.S. media, which is so complacent about challenging the reputation of this country's military and has been so lacking in coverage of Iraqi civilian casualties. And, of course, the caution of the media (with the exception of Rather and his CBS crew) during our presidential election made the timing of the Lancet's publication work against the story making headlines here.There's a lot more must-read material in this smart, first-rate article--you can read it in its entirety by clicking here.

Posted by Direland at 06:20 AM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c0c4453ef00d834586daf69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference WHY U.S. MEDIA DISMISSED THE LANCET STUDY OF 100,000 IRAQI CIVILIAN DEAD:

» Things I've Been Reading from A Tiny Revolution
"Condoleezza Rice Arrives Just in Time to Supervise US Decline" at Black Commentator. "Bush's Unaccountability Moment" by Nat Parry at Consortium News. Andrew Schamess' thoughts on yesterday's anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz. Doug Ireland on... [Read More]

Tracked on Jan 28, 2005 11:27:22 AM

» Most Oppose Gay Marriage; Fewer Back an Amendment from News Poll Finds
BC News Poll Finds Greater Intensity Among Same-Sex Marriage Opponents [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 9, 2006 8:39:18 PM

» Goals of Freedom from politics and
and social change have become mixed in a cocktail whose flavor is not yet clear [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 11, 2006 2:27:09 AM

» Have Barbie Spin-Offs Hit Racy Limit? from dolls that encourage
Hasbro has been criticized as producing risqu dolls that encourage children to eroticize their playtime. Where are Barbie's [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 11, 2006 2:38:11 PM

» CULTURE: Find Out Your Great(x10000) Grandfather from Robinson] knew
drew a blank. So he turned to the burgeoning field of "bioarchaeology," having his DNA tested to see what it revealed about his origins. He was in for [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 12, 2006 9:55:50 PM

» Mavs Thrive From Line as Heat Tosses Bricks from inability to
Myers of the Fort Worth STAR-TELEGRAM writes, The Mavericks knew they could gain an advantage [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 19, 2006 12:58:04 AM

» Terry Gets His Rhythm Back from Feigen of the
He was all over cable television and talk radio. He was the lightning rod of opinion and debate. [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 29, 2006 1:04:32 AM

» Learn the GIS Lexicon from A to Z - New ESRI Press Book Teaches the Technology's Terminology from GIS: An Illustrated
of Geographic Information Systems' helps users understand key GIS terms such as geocoding, polylines, and georeferencing. [Read More]

Tracked on Aug 7, 2006 2:43:40 PM

» Bahrain third in 2007 from to its familiar
on the Formula One calendar in 2007 after hosting this year's season opener. [Read More]

Tracked on Aug 8, 2006 4:10:33 AM

Comments

One dead Iraq child is too many. The Amerikan
military has no right to be in Iraq. The
Rednecks fighting for peace and freedom is
completely absurd. Bush should be put on trial
for war crimes just as Nixon should have. When
will Amerika give of it's wealth.? They have so
much wealth, but just stink like dirty, greedy
PIGS And Japan after 50 years of Peace, follow
the Amerikan government just like puppets-its
completey insane-Don't you remember Hiroshima and
Nagasaki-Tokyo air raids-No-Why SDF in Iraq????

Posted by: don thrasher | Feb 6, 2005 6:44:12 PM

We have not forgotten, have we ?

Extra! - November/December 2001

"We Think the Price Is Worth It"

Media uncurious about Iraq policy's effects- there or here

By Rahul Mahajan

Lesley Stahl on U.S. sanctions against Iraq: We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?

Secretary of State Madeleine Albright: I think this is a very hard choice, but the price--we think the price is worth it.

--60 Minutes (5/12/96)

Full story - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/2vmc8

It hurts !

HR

Posted by: Henk Ruyssenaars | Jan 28, 2005 2:50:36 PM

If the Lancet study is read carefully, because the percentage of children in the Iraqi population is high, out of the 100,000 innocents who died from the Iraqi war, 38,000 were children.

More than 38,000 children have died because of the war in Iraq.

Those lost lives should be acknowledged as much as the lost lives of the 1000+ members of the military who have died in Iraq.

Posted by: Colleen | Jan 28, 2005 7:43:38 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.