« An Iranian Trans Torture Victim Speaks from Inside Iran | Main | MARIO COOPER'S CALL FOR A BLACK ACT UP »
February 08, 2006
THREATS TO PRESS FREEDOM ON BOTH COASTS
The global controversy over the Danish caricatures of Mohammed (one of which is at left) has claimed its first U.S. victims in the American press -- the weekly New York Press's editor in chief Harry Siegel and three of his colleagues (two editors and a reporter) resigned in protest after the paper's new
management pulled this week's front page, which carried an editorial attacking those who refused to publish the cartoons, and reproduced some of the cartoons themselves. You can find the full resignation statement of Siegel and his comrades in this week's New York Observer. You can read my own view of this international attack on the right to publish the cartoons in an article I wrote for the excellent London-based 'zine on issues, Open Democracy, entitled "The Right to Caricature God -- and His Prophets." Bravo to Siegel and his colleagues for standing up for principle and being willing to pay the price.
Out on the West Coast, my L.A. Weekly colleague Marc Cooper (right) is under attack by a threatened lawsuit from the United Farm Workers union, which has been on a long downhill slide -- in ethics, politics, and membership -- since the
days when it was lead by the late Cesar Chavez (left). Cooper's crime was penning a stinging dissection last August, "Sour Grapes: California farm workers' endless struggle 40 years later." In a blatant attempt to silence critics of the union for its organizing stasis, its collecting monies supposedly destined for the farmworkers but which finance the nest-feathering, incestuous construction of a skein of agencies by its morally spavined leadership, the UFW has targeted not only l'ami Cooper, but also the L.A. Times -- which has been targeted for a similar lawsuit for its four-part investigative series on the UFW -- and the Bakersfield Californian. Of these multiple law suits, Cooper writes:
"The union...has responded [to critics] in the worst way possible. Instead of taking any of the very valid press criticism to heart and conducting some minimal good-faith re-examination of its own work, it has, instead, bunkered in and lashed out
wildly at its critics. The UFW has enlisted Hollywood publicist Steve Rivers, as well as local Congressman Howard Berman (left), in its defensive PR campaign. Berman, to his credit, is an original co-author of landmark state agricultural-labor-protection legislation, and his tight relationship with the UFW dates back decades. But Berman and the UFW are also integral political partners, and union cash was a primary lubricant of the legendary Waxman-Berman political machine. No wonder, then, that the UFW has called in its chits in hiring Berman and
other prominent Democrats — like former Clinton cabinet secretary Mickey Kantor (below right)— to run offense against the press.
"The chilling tactics now being employed by the UFW are those it has learned from its abusive employers. Simultaneously threatening a number of news agencies and reporters with expensive lawsuits smells suspiciously similar to the corporate strategy of pressing so-called SLAPP suits against public critics. These suits are never intended to seek any real redress — only to inflict punishment. In this case, their collateral effect would be to shut down media scrutiny of the UFW...." Read Cooper's full account of all this, and his reply to the UFW, by clicking here. Hang tough, Brother Marc, UFW deserved every shot you gave them.
And Wayne Besen reports on his blog that, "A Northern Virginia radio show that caters
to a younger gay audience received threats this week to shut down, or else. E-mails from right wing yahoos hinted at violence if Chad Larson (left), host of The Edge Show , did not cancel his program.....'The penalty for homosexuality is death. Humans are not allowed to kill,' one e-mail stated. 'That's why God sent AIDS. When Chad Larson is lying on his death bed from this incurable illness, he will wish he had of turned to us for help....'" Read the full story by clicking here.
Posted by Doug Ireland at 06:05 PM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c0c4453ef00d83460289769e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference THREATS TO PRESS FREEDOM ON BOTH COASTS:
» consolidation loan program student
from loan student
Loans Home Equity Loans - Home Mortgage Student Loans [Read More]
Tracked on May 30, 2006 7:17:40 PM
» FDA Approves Cervical Cancer Vaccine from approves cervical
approves cervical cancer vaccine, Gardasil, for use in girls and woman age 9-26 [Read More]
Tracked on Jun 10, 2006 2:43:20 PM
» Federal probe of drugs in sports goes beyond BALCO / Pitcher whose home was raided said he used human growth drug, according to affidavit from raid on the home
home of a veteran pitcher for the Arizona Diamondbacks highlights a gaping loophole in Major League Baseball's steroid [Read More]
Tracked on Jun 12, 2006 7:35:49 AM
» 'Melvin' Still After Hughes' Fortune from hirty Years After
hirty Years After Howard Hughes' Death, Melvin Dummar Returns to Court [Read More]
Tracked on Jun 17, 2006 5:30:35 AM
» 'Is this the cure for ME?' from in people with
It is not possible to evaluate the findings as insufficient details relating to the study have been found.
[Read More]
Tracked on Jun 17, 2006 11:22:56 AM
» Drive-Thru Pot Smoke Gives Pair Away from Wafting Through
Wafting Through Drive-Thru Window Gives Pair Away at a KFC Restaurant in Buffalo [Read More]
Tracked on Jun 30, 2006 11:48:09 AM
» Salmons Won't be a Raptor from for $23 million,
veteran, was to have gone to the Raptors in a sign-and-trade deal in which the Sixers were to receive [Read More]
Tracked on Jul 24, 2006 2:03:37 PM
» Undercover Investigation Finds Sensitive Defense Equipment Sold from to subscribe.
and broadcast, digital signage and narrowcasting, wireless and other
applications. [Read More]
Tracked on Jul 24, 2006 6:06:33 PM
» Software Planner Improves The Software Development Lifecycle With Configurable Workflow And Robust Project Reporting from feature linkages,
(SDLC) tool. Software Planner release 7.6 offers configurable workflow, feature linkages, and enhanced [Read More]
Tracked on Jul 24, 2006 9:46:06 PM
» Grizzlies' Stoudamire: I'm about 85, 90 percent from knee. Since then
Damon Stoudamire on the court was December 30 of last year in Portland. His season ended that night when he ruptured the [Read More]
Tracked on Aug 8, 2006 4:54:47 PM
Comments
Howard Hughes:
The other story to compare with Melvin Dummars' at www.mymrhughes.com. You decide which one is more plausible.
Thanks
Jack
Posted by: Jack | Jul 11, 2006 9:12:29 PM
Doug, I read your column in Opendemocracy and I could not agree with you more. I quote your concluding para: "The western media outlets that have refused to reproduce any of the cartoons – especially those in the United States – have just handed the theocratic primitives a victory, and thus increased their power. Instead, let's hear a loud cheer for irreverence – the intelligent person's response to the mad fantasies of all revealed religions."
I will quote you in my future posts on the series "The Freedom to be Offended" which can be found at http://www.deeshaa.org/2006/02/07/the-freedom-to-be-offended-part-3/
Posted by: Atanu Dey | Feb 16, 2006 11:57:00 PM
I completely agree with hollowentry. Our freedoms should not be taken for granted by publishing hateful things. Bottom line is we have a choice as human beings to respect each other or destroy each other. A stone was tossed by drawing those cartoons and publishing them, or in this case a match into a poweder keg. The behaviour on both sides is deplorable.
Posted by: Whitfield | Feb 12, 2006 3:27:49 PM
Jeez, Doug you are an idiot at times, after your bullshit about Galloway and homophobia you now perpetuate the out and out racist provocation of the cartoons by publishing them on your site.
If your not clever enough to realise this has nothing to do with 'free speech' (a nice liberal myth at that, I wonder who has more freedom me or rupert murdoch) but RACISM pure and simple
attacking muslims is now the acceptable face of racism in the world, well done for joining the club
and I'm sorry on the Danish paper you are wrong:
Jyllands-Posten campaigned in 1984 to censor an artist who produced an erotic image of Jesus.
Refused three years ago to print a cartoon because the editors said it would provoke an outcry among Christians.
No brave commitment to freedom of speech there. That was only invoked, cynically, when the editors chose to target Muslims, not for debate about religious views, but with bigoted caricatures that imply every Muslim is a terrorist.
shame on you for joining them
Posted by: noel | Feb 12, 2006 6:15:37 AM
I thought about adding a note to that comment but I shrugged it off.
You know nothing of my sexuality one way or the other (or both) but lets assume I'm straight.
Please explain leather-boy SA kitsch to me. Please explain the esthetics of "power." Please explain the difference between left wing contempt for bourgeois hypocrisy and reactionary contempt for bourgeois morality.
Please respond to the possibility that 'Uncle' Gore's politics is little more or little less than a strong -noble?- sense of noblesse oblige. I have trouble thinking of it any other way, but I'm still grateful for it.
So people are complex, and so are their politics. I'd tattoo "Gore Vidal for President" on my ass and vote for him if he promised to stop yammering on about Jack and Jackie. I don't really give a damn about Tom of Finland and his memorials to the boys of the German army. Did you know Hugo Boss designed uniforms for the SS?
Schön!
But I knew Reaganite/Thatcherite slimeballs whose politics was grotesque; and I remember their act-up T shirts. And I had friends who quit that organization in disgust.
And free speech is the result of an agreement freely made, not some sort of ahistorical context-free absolute.
We agree on the issue here "Hollow..." but if I offended you or anyone else I don't care.
Posted by: Seth Edenbaum | Feb 11, 2006 11:45:33 PM
sorry for the language.
Posted by: hollowentry | Feb 11, 2006 8:53:00 PM
fuck social contracts and fuck you seth for turning in one vicious prejudice for another.
Posted by: hollowentry | Feb 11, 2006 8:52:19 PM
Freedom of speech is the result of a very specific sort of social contract. Respect for the rights of others to say what they want is not so much a cause as a result of mutual respect.
Tell me about muslims in Europe. Tell me about how easy it is for the children of immigants -who were born in Denmark!- to become Danish citizens.
God save us all from all homosexual idealists and Faggot Fascists.
Posted by: Seth Edenbaum | Feb 11, 2006 5:59:27 PM
Is there a URL or some kind of independent confirmation that the J-P newspaper has indeed published caricatures of Jesus and other Christian figures? All I find on Google searches for are news reports about JP rejecting Jesus cartoons by Christoffer Zieler.
http://media.guardian.co.uk/site/story/0,,1703500,00.html
http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/0,1518,druck-399840,00.html
Posted by: jklugman | Feb 10, 2006 11:16:31 PM
But then you get people like Andrew Sullivan standing up for 'freedom' but publishing this defence of Pim Fortuyn:
http://time.blogs.com/daily_dish/2006/02/fortuyn.html
I know it's pretentious but I'll quote my response - the issue is bloody impotant:
"It seems that suddenly this demagogue of the far/wacko-right is being lined up for political beatification by Sullivan (and his coterie of catholic queens?). Fortuyn was a populist in the worst possible sense: first and foremost extremely adept at using whatever issue was convenient to his nefarious purposes, and despite whether the weirdo who murdered him was a lunatic leftist or not, he was playing the racist anti-immigrant card effectively. His movement was gaining great momentum in the Netherlands.
After many long conversations with friends in Holland about his politics (as a gay man seeing the increasing number of bashings and incidents of harassment perpetrated by Muslim men on the gay community, it was all too easy to generalize), I found there to be an important principle in trying to differentiate between an ethnic group and their religion and to avoid the easy racism of Pim Fotuyn and his ilk.
This type of facile distortion is a grave danger that responsible journalism should avoid at all costs!"
Posted by: Leonard Jordaan | Feb 9, 2006 9:58:24 PM
A couple of items that provide context for this imbroglio:
1. The paper wanted to instigate trouble, just not the kind of trouble it got. And in this mission it acted in concert with the Danish government. "We have gone to war against the multicultural ideology that says that everything is equally valid," boasted the minister of cultural affairs, Brian Mikkelsen, in a speech at his party's annual meeting the week before Rose's cartoon editorial last fall. Mikkelsen is a 39-year-old political science graduate known for his hankering for the "culture war." He continued, "The Culture War has now been raging for some years. And I think we can conclude that the first round has been won." The next front, he said, is the war against the acceptance of Muslims norms and ways of thought. The Danish cultural heritage is a source of strength in an age of globalization and immigration. Cultural restoration, he argued, is the best antidote.
full: http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2006/02/08/denmark/print.html
2. Posted to Marxmail this morning by Paul Flewers, a British socialist: List members may be interested to note that according to a pal of mine who spent several years working in Denmark and was active on the Danish left, the paper involved in the cartoon scandal is usually referred to as the 'Pesten', that is, pestilence, rather than 'Posten' in left-wing circles. It has a long history of hard right-wing standpoints, going back to its pro-Hitler days in the 1930s. I think that this whole business is a provocation. I reckon the paper ran the cartoons knowing that they would upset Muslims as a whole, and elicit an angry response from Islamicist militants, in order to brand all Muslims as head-bangers. Then, in the furore, the paper would be able to squeal 'free speech, free speech' -- an old trick on the part of the right wing. My pal told me the other day that anti-Muslim sentiments are strong in Denmark; I can't believe that the paper's editors did not know what they were doing.
Posted by: Louis Proyect | Feb 9, 2006 9:28:44 AM
thanks for the information.
Posted by: hollowentry | Feb 9, 2006 2:48:55 AM
REPLY TO HOLLOWENTRY:
You're wrong on the facts when you say that the Danish daily Jyllands-Posten "had previously refused to depict Jesus in a bad light" -- in fact, the newspaper has just reprinted a series of cartoons of Jesus and other Christian religious figures (including the Pope) that had previously run in the paper.
Posted by: Doug Ireland | Feb 9, 2006 2:36:45 AM
"has claimed its first U.S. victims"
Doug, given that several people have been shot dead--for demonstrating against the racist portrayal of a figure of respect who was made to look like a terrorist--I think this is a manipulative use of language where you turn the poor race-baiters into casualties. In contrast, people shot dead are, supposedly then, evil fanatics who had it coming, friendly fire to protect the right to free expression?
And what about the billion Muslim people who have not burned down an empty building or a flag? They aren't casualties in a concerted attempt to humiliate them? And not for portraying Mohammed, but for portraying him as a big-nosed terrorist. Do you see the difference?
Yes, I know you will take exception for me daring to say 'race-baiters'. But if the publication of these cartoons, in a journal that had previously refused to depict Jesus in a bad light, is morphologically the exact same thing as a race-baiting cartoon, it functions the same way, then what are these cartoons then? Just the free expression of secular humanism against evil theocratic fascism right? And the bullets that shot those Afghan protesters dead, what form of expression were those?
Posted by: hollowentry | Feb 8, 2006 10:27:41 PM